Subscribe
Add to Technorati Favourites
Add to del.icio.us

This web diary will log some of my various thoughts and experiments within the scientific domain of Beltism. It goes into more personal details, than the associated website. "Beltism" is a relatively new science (discovered by Peter W. Belt), still little known and understood. It deals with energy fields in our environment that affect human senses, by reducing the tension these fields create within us, when around them. This allows us to better perceive sounds, in particular, musical sounds. Among other things, the practice of Beltism can improve our ability to perceive both music and video. The goal behind my research into Beltism is first and foremost; to better understand this marvelous and oddly mysterious phenomenon. Secondly, it is to learn how to improve the quality of my sound at home (or at concerts). This focuses primarily in increasing the quality of music reproduction, but by extension, it also includes improving the sound of home cinema, tv, computers, mp3 players, car stereos, etc. Even video, such as tv or computer monitors. Anyone reading this blog can participate in at least some of whatever experiments I may detail, as they require no technical expertise or implements, and hopefully, benefit from them.

n.b. This is a more personal offshoot of my site, "The Advanced Audiophile", which provides more background on Beltism and its founder and creator. It contains as well, a plethora of experiments created mostly by Peter Belt, for the curious to dip their toe in the water and experience one of the world's least known and most fascinating discoveries of human science. (See tab at top of page). Have fun!

Bookmark and Share

Categories:

I get a lot of that, actually. And a lot of this as well: "How come I never heard of it?!". This is an alternative science that has a lot going against it, in terms of how implausible it seems. But it has been studied and practiced by thousands of people across the globe for over a quarter of a century, because it has helped them and their acquaintances achieve benefits for that long. It has passed blind tests involving over a thousand participants. It has been testified to by numerous journalists in both print and online audio publications, since the 80's. Myself, I have been witnessing its effects for nigh on twenty years. It just isn't something that's all that easy to get into normally; intellectually or otherwise.

But once that happens everything changes. And the impossible becomes the implausible, the implausible becomes the possible. I maintain, from experience in testing the phenomenon on others, that you don't have to be an audiophile to hear the effects, or appreciate the considerable benefits that can be derived from them. But it helps. However, it doesn't help if you're the type of audiophile who is more concerned with ideology than you are with sound quality. With an open mind and open ears, there can be a lot to learn within the science of Beltism. And help is usually only a click or two away. Hope you find something worthwhile and interesting while you are here. n.b. Posts that contain actual experiments anyone can try themselves, will be tagged with the label "Experiments". (see "Categories" in the sidebar)


"Truth in science can be defined as the working hypothesis best suited to open the way to the next better one."- Konrad Lorenz

Bookmark and Share

Categories:

"PWB Morphic Cable Label" from P.W.B. Electronics, U.K.

"Not your grandfather's cable clip."


INTRODUCTION 

After a year of generally dour news around the globe, there is a light at the end of 2021's tunnel. It came from "P.W.B. Electronics" at around Christmas time, in the form of a curious and colourful pair of small plastic clippy things. 

I'm always happy to see new products developed by PWB, and this one is a first. Perhaps a distant cousin to an earlier product, PWB’s “Spiratube”, it is a treated clip of sorts, meant to be attached to a wire or cable, among other things, with the sole purpose of improving the quality of sound (and other other senses) perceived. 

If I didn’t know what it was (and I didn’t when I first laid eyes on it!), my best guess would have been "earphone organizer?". For that reason, I plan to test it on my collection of earphones! In any regard, I think it’s a brilliant idea. What audiophile doesn’t have cables? There’s a lot of potential there, because there are all kinds of cables (audio and not)… or wire, as the instructions note, on which it could be employed. Who says it has to be audio cables? Could be telephone cables, electrical cables, internet cables, etc.!

This could get mighty interesting! 😊


PRE-IMPRESSIONS

(n.b. These are my initial non-auditory impressions of these devices, from the point of view of a 'feeling audiophile'! For those that can't relate, (ie. everyone else?), this may have very limited interest! But I think it does offer a unique perspective on the product. Still, feel free to skip this section, if you wish!). 

Holding them in my hand, they feel “heavy”, in terms of their energy, when compared to everything else that came in the envelope they were sent in.  As a measure of this, I can sense that I would be able to pick out the Morphic Cable Label devices blindly, among similarly shaped pieces of ordinary untreated plastic. What this finding indicates to me, is that they will have a noticeable effect on sound, when installed and tested. But not necessarily what that sound will be. The green one had a ‘lighter’ feel than the magenta. So, in testing, I expect them each to have a slightly different influence on sound.


WHAT IT IS, WHAT IT IS

A pretty simple device, who's application is pretty straightforward as well. Each Morphic Cable Label Device is a thin piece of flexible (but not readily breakable) plastic, with gold and silver labels on either side of the main body, and curly tips at either end. The device is attached by having the wire or cable curled around the ends. Because the tips are quite expandable, it should be able to attach to any size of household cable.

Like all audio 'devices'/treatments from P.W.B., it works by reducing levels of human tension. Which in turn, has an effect on our qualities of sensory perception. Including what we're most interested in here; our ability to perceive sound


GETTING ACQUAINTED 

General Orientation

I 'feel-tested' the orientation of a Morphic Cable device in my hand, by spinning it into various positions; horizontal, vertical, in, out, up, down, etc. So in its free (unattached) state, the ‘generally’ most preferable position I came up with, is where the device is oriented vertically, with the direction of the writing on the label  pointing toward earth, and the side with the small square of 'Silver Rainbow Foil", facing the listener. Thus, if it can be installed in exactly this way, on a wire or cable that is nicely receptive to it, that should provide good result. (Unless of course the interaction with what its attached to, necessitates a somewhat different orientation).

Point of Comparison

When the Morphic Cable Label device is attached to a cable in a horizontal fashion, it can be oriented so that the gold label faces up, and the silver one down; or vice-versa. I found that with the Gold label toward the floor, the soundstage was smaller, but more precise. With the Gold label oriented toward the ceiling, the soundstage was larger, more vibrant, and with a closer presence…. But with softer, less precise transients. And resulting from that, a bit less engaging, musically. (n.b. A comparable difference may be expected, when the device is on a cable in a vertical position). YMMV.


LOCATION LOCATION LOCATION 

The obvious locations for such a device, is naturally going to be wires and cables. But it doesn't absolutely have to be. If you think outside the wire.... for example, it seems to mate pretty well with wood. Such as when blue-tacked onto this wall shelf below. 



But 'pretty well' in this case, simply means I found better locations for it!


INTERNET ROUTER:

P.W.B.'s inspiration for this device came from one customer's desire to treat the source wire going into his internet router, which at its end, is covered by the housing of the router. This also happens to describe my router, which uses a fibre-optic cable, terminating inside a hinged plastic housing. 

Still, I couldn't really attach the device to the very end of the cable, where it enters the router jack, with that housing in its closed position, since it would interfere with the latching of the housing. But this could be done, if the housing that covers the cable's end, were left ajar.

Then there was the question of "There are two colours... which colour to choose?". I ‘energy-tested’ the green one by placing it against all of the cables on the back of my router, including the power cable, and it mated best with the fibre-optic cable, carrying the internet line from outside the building. I didn’t test whether the Morphic Cable tag should be applied at the wall end, where the Internet cable enters the building, or at the router end, where it enters the router. 

That is because many, many moons ago, I have established and lived by ‘rules’ about such things. Which is that, treatments should always be applied to the input end (generally as close to the input itself as possible). Here, this means the router end. Also, that any sort of writing (as on the cable or on a label), should always follow the direction of the signal. This means I apply the Morphic Link Cable Label device with the writing on the gold label in the direction of the input jack on the router.

That still leaves whether the gold label should be facing moon (top) or earth (bottom). Once the device was placed on the fibre-optic internet cable, just before the router end of it, I determined by feel, that it is best turned so that it is positioned to where the Silver Rainbow Foil is facing the surface of the desk (earth). 

Now, although I did try 'feeling' for every position possible, and although what I described above was determined to be the best position, it still didn’t ‘feel’ quite right, inside me.  Something was slightly off… maybe the colour wasn’t the best fit for this application? Wasn't sure yet....  but what I was sure of, is that the sound was leagues better than before applying the Morphic Link Cable Label! 

Everything was clearer, with the overall resolution noticeably higher (as though an “HQ” or “HD” label got slapped on to the music!). Bringing out more details and simply, more music.

Now… to fix that slight “off” feeling! 

Next I tried the magenta version in the same fashion but… that didn’t solve it. Then I tried something I didn’t think would work… I moved the device much further down the cable, nearer to the wall, closer to where it exits out of (or comes in from, depending on your perspective!) the room. I could tell, just by placing it there, that this was right. That slight feeling of tension was mainly gone. Listening to the same song again, confirmed it. The sound was now more rounded, natural, leaving me with that “peaceful, easy feeling” during the listening session. 

In conclusion, I can confirm that an Internet router cable is a good location for this device. But as to where it should go on that cable... I don't feel that's really conclusive (yet?). On the middle of the cable? At the wall where it exits the building? Or the normally presumed best spot, which is at the router end, as close to the jack as possible? Perhaps this is more of a "YMMV" situation. Or perhaps I might find the router location best, if I try moving it back there again. I just don't want to move it now, because the sound is too good! Fortunately, I have a second one (in magenta), to test other locations with.... 


FURTHER NOTES ON THE SOUND: 

Some time later, I had a more careful listen to the sound of the green Morphic Cable Label device, situated somewhere around the middle of my internet fibre optic cable. As compared to the sound I was getting before installing this device, the soundstage is definitely wider than before. That ‘rounding’ of notes that occurred when I first installed the Green cable tag, has become much ‘rounder’. Hence, now, the sound is very warm, and very sweet. Listener fatigue, this sound suggests, will be impossible. It could be argued by some, there is less detail, in this type of change heard. Notably in mids and highs. 

But the fluidity of the music, which carries you along and lets you hear the layout of familiar songs in ways you’ve never heard before, tells a different story. One that could be entitled “This Is Right”, or “This Is Something Special”. πŸ˜ƒ


KEYBOARD:

Noting a computer keyboard was mentioned in the instructional leaflet that came with the devices, I thought that ought to be an interesting location. I have never treated a keyboard before. Or even a USB cable, to my recollection.

THE SET-UP

'Feel-testing' different positions, I ended up with the device at the USB input end, with the writing on the gold label in the direction of the USB input (same as the router). But this time, I preferred the Gold label facing up, on top of the cable. (Though neither up nor down felt perfectly right to me). The feeling I got after applying the tag (but before listening to the result), was curiously, not the same as with the router. 

Within a second or two of applying it, I started feeling ‘sleepy’! (In that, my eyes wanted to close, my body wanted to shut down). This is really not a typical reaction for me in such a test… but it is a desirable one. For I know what this means… I will be sucked into the music. And upon the actual listening test, boy, was I not wrong about that!

THE SOUND

As soon as the music played, I was totally absorbed by it, frozen in place, eyes wide shut. The 'stereoscape' (aka soundstage) was larger, but otherwise, I’m just not sure what changed, on a 'technical' level. I was too engrossed in the experience, to be able to analyze it that way.

So yes, the keyboard is a good thing!  In fact, I was surprised this little device could have that kind of an effect. Assuming it can be achieved as easily as I did, this character of sound is exactly what an audiophile should want, and need. When you can produce a sound where it doesn’t even matter what the frequency profile is, or anything like that, because you’ve experienced a deeper connection to the music, then that’s all you really need. πŸ˜„

After at least another hour of listening to my familiar music, my initial findings did not change, they were only reinforced. The keyboard installation produced a tonally rich, warm, sweet, expansive sound. Moreover, a low-tension sound, that puts a new perspective on familiar material in my music collection. 

n.b. In my personal opinion, the way this device (or any, really!) is oriented, can have an influence on the final result. For example, one orientation might give a sound that has less 'sparkle' (ie. on piano, strings), but a more natural, fluid sound. Another might have greater top end detail, but give a more 'analytical' sound. And I'm sure a balance between the two can always be had! πŸ˜ƒ


MOUSE:

I tried attaching the Morphic Cable Label to the input end of a wired optical mouse on one of my computers. Sonically speaking, that proved to be a special location as well! If it wasn’t the best overall, it was in the top three. It gave a warmer sound, but with no lack of definition or engagement.


SPEAKER WIRE:

After 'feeling' the difference between red and black terminations, I attached the (magenta) Morphic Cable tag to the red (+) speaker wire, at the input end, behind the speaker. It was positioned just before the plug, with the wording on the Gold label in the direction of the speaker. I felt this was a good location to experiment with, as it seemed to produce the best sound yet, among the objects tested in that room. Sound: strong, well balanced, good definition and soundstage.


AMAZON FireTV:

Because, why not? The Morphic Cable tag was clipped on to the end of the USB cable, just before it enters a USB (5v) power adapter. The other end of which is connected to my Amazon FireTV streaming box. The lettering on the Gold label is directed toward the power adapter. Sound: Overall positive results, but perhaps not as beneficial as the loudspeaker. 


AMAZON FireTV Part 2: FireTV vs AMAZON ECHO:

In addition to the FireTV, I tested the Morphic Cable Label at the end of the power cord that leads into one of my Amazon Echo smart speakers. I did comparisons between the two units a few times (carefully maintaining the same configuration each time).There is definitely a consistent but different sound signature between each device. The FireTV has the larger, fatter sound. The Echo has the smaller, but more precise sound. Both had the lettering on the Gold foil in the direction of the respective units, with the Morphic Cable device oriented below the cable.


POWER CORDS:  

Instead of an audio cable, or a telephony cable, why not a power cable? Doesn't that open up a lot of possibilities?! These devices can be married to any machine with a power cord. Doesn't have to be an audio component. Could be... say.... one of my coffee grinders?....

After attaching the Morphic Cable Label tag to the end of the  machine's power cord, I did a brief non-auditory 'feel test'. The energy feedback didn’t feel particularly great. So I really wasn't sure this would be a good installation. But upon listening to the result, I liked it better than I thought I would. 

Yes, the soundstage was small (this is what must have thrown me off, during the ‘feel test’). But the rhythm and tonal balance, were enticing. As though the players got better during the intermission, and started making beautiful music together. There was a more natural feel to the sound, than many of the other locations I had tried. Even if it was less obvious than those other locations, that the sound has improved as much.

Of course, there are going to be variations here, depending upon device you plug in. Perhaps even the colour of the ac cord (mine was black). Since the grinder wasn’t ever turned on for this test, I still think any AC powered device is going to be a safe bet for one of these cable label tags. And it's entirely possible, the sound could get better, if the device is operating!


EARPHONES:

For someone that loves wired earphones, these cable devices become quite an interesting prospect. Quick pop quiz: How many audio enhancement devices for wired earphones, can you name in under 5 seconds, that are not made by P.W.B. Electronics? Exactly! Zero.  πŸ˜€ 

Now, it's one thing to employ P.W.B. devices in the home, to treat a variety of things, that will enhance your sound. That's terribly easy to do, with such a vast array available. But what if you want to improve your sound on-the-go? You can't 'treat' the world! But you can easily attach (and remove!) a Morphic Cable tag to any pair of earphones, you happen to fancy for use, on any given day. For someone who has about four dozen earphones, this becomes an interesting proposition indeed. Even a taste of the PWB-enhanced sound while out and about, is better than not!

I fitted the magenta Morphic Cable Label device to my Faaeals, and it certainly did improve the sound of the mp3 player! I'd say roughly?.... by approximately 50% better. But, if I were to compare it to some of the better home-based locations I found for the Cable tags, I'd say those are probably a wiser choice, at home. 

Unless, as I often do, you listen to your mp3 player or even cell phone, at home! And when not at home, this one's a no-brainer. If the Morphic Cable Label tag is better than PWB's 'Spiratube', as suggested (mind, I have not yet compared the two!), then there is no better way to enhance portable sound, than this.

PICTURES:

The instructional leaflet that accompanies the Morphic Cable Labels also told of an idea that involves attaching one of these devices to the wire that holds a picture or a painting on the wall. So I had to try it out for myself, of course. Starting by attaching the tag to the middle of the wire, with the Gold label facing the wall, and carefully hanging the painting.

You might think this an odd selection, but in fact, what I heard in this brief test, was very promising. I would say it competes with the loudspeaker installation. The loudspeaker had a 'larger' sound, but the painting had a sound that was a bit more accurate, and the music had a good flow (to the Linnies among us, that means "PRAT"!). It occurs to me that fitting it to a larger picture or painting, might yield a better result than even the loudspeaker. Definitely something worth experimenting with.

CLOCK:

And what does our little 'morphic' friend say to clocks, I wonder? I have a small 5v AC-powered LED clock, to which I fitted a Morphic Cable Label at the end of the power cord, which inputs to the clock. 

In this brief test, I would at least have to say the results were markedly different, to what I heard in tests with other objets. With the clock, the sound was the most engaging (up to that point in the test series), but the least accurate. ie. To where the definition of instruments appeared blurred. 

I'd put a bookmark on this one. For just the fact that it can produce a different type of sound. Because if you match one of these with the right audiophile and the right clock at the right location... it might just produce some special surprises. 


WIRELESS BLUETOOTH ADAPTER

Another brief test idea, was to fit the Cable tag somewhere on a bluetooth adapter unit (that I use to send a newschool bluetooth audio source, to an oldschool vintage desktop stereo). That 'somewhere' location was an obvious one. On one of the RCA phono cables, connected to the adapter. Specifically, the red-plugged cable, just before it enters the input of the bluetooth adapter. 

I'd say the results were 'good', but a bit better when the Morphic Cable Label device was positioned vertically on the phono cable. However, this was not considered to be as good as some of the other locations mentioned. That's not a ruling on all devices with RCA phono cables; only on this one!



WATER TANK

As a last minute addition, I decided to briefly check out some areas I had omitted, such as the refrigerator cord, the hot water tank. The refrigerator cord wasn't the hot spot that I thought it would be, and a degradation of sound quality, to what I already achieved. This could well be due to factors such as the colour of the cord (beige), the shape (flat), or the fact that it was an extension.

Didn't have too much luck with the hot water tank either. It's not a full test, because I couldn't easily access the entry points of the water pipes that eventually lead to the tank. I tried 'feeling' for a good spot where the pipes that come out of the wall near the tank are located, and also the end of the brass or copper pipe leading into the tank. The end of the brass pipe leading into the tank was 'ok' I guess... but none of this really 'spoke' to me. (None of it suggested, by way of feel, that it was an improvement on what I had).

So I went lower.... There's a brass exit pipe near the bottom of the tank. But its too short and wide to fit the MCL device. And anyway, it seemed a bit better when I went a bit lower... about an inch lower, to the very floor underneath the bottom tank valve. Specifically, I rested the device on a plastic basin that the tank is sitting on. And more specifically, it felt better as I moved the device further from the tank, than closer to it (but leaving it in the basin! See blurry photo above, for an idea!). So to recap, the Morphic Cable Label is now underneath a brass spigot at the bottom of my hot water tank, and about an inch or so away from the edge of the tank. 

And believe it or not... upon listening to music (I used Randy Newman's "Last Night I Had A Dream" as the test piece, for its piano intro), this was interesting. The image and soundstage wasn't the largest I'd heard, but control and precision were better than what I started with, before this round of tests. This translated to a pretty strong attachment to the musical performance. 

In other words, I was getting into the music more than before. And this was a quality of sound I could definitely live with! It was hard to fault, just on a tonal level. No lack of sparkle in the top end, for example. A bit lighter bottom end perhaps, but the definition in bass notes had definitely improved. I can maybe describe the sound this way: when playing music, it sounds more like you are listening to the master tape, than a transcription. 

I'm not crazy about leaving the MCL in that dusty location. There might even be better floor-based locations, such as in the Eastern most part of my place... But after briefly trying a couple of such locations (including under the fridge!), I couldn't 'feel' any. What can I say, I'm a slave to the sound. πŸ˜”


FLOOR vs. EARPHONES:

Here's what I wanted to know, though: Because I was in the hallway for this, I was listening to an mp3 player via wired earphones, as the source for the test. "Normally" (is anything 'normal' in the world of Beltism though?!), you treating the source of the music is likely to be more effective than an unrelated object. So what happens if I take the MCL device from the floor near the hot water tank, then install it on the earphones I am using for the test, while still standing in front of the hot water tank, as I did in the prior test?

Well, I'll tell you: the sound was better with the MCL device on the floor near the hot water tank! Again, that wonderful control and precision was better, in the previous test, than the current one, where it was installed on my earphones. 

Of course, as I expected, when I returned the device back to the floor of the tank, it just wasn't as good as it was before! (I don't know why, but the devices always seem to sound better upon the first installation. Again, it's a whole different set of rules and expectations for Beltist devices!). But, I can say, that though not as good as before, it was still better on the floor near the hot water tank, than what I heard when I returned it to the end of the earphone wire. 

What I learned or confirmed in this brief round of last-minute tests, is that the Morphic Cable Label (and also the Spiratube that preceded it), are responsive to changes in location and installation. Which means, choosing the right one, through experimentation, can yield a sound that may bring a whole new experience and relationship with your music, you didn't have before.

The reason I include PWB's earlier cable-enhancement product, "Spiratube" in that equation, is because when I went to install the Morphic Cable Label tag on my refrigerator cord, I noticed I had already a bit of Spiratube on there. (I removed the Spiratube of course, before testing the MCL tag on the cord). 

But because the MCL tag didn't yield particularly good results there, I wondered if perhaps the Spiratube wasn't a good match there either? So I had a listen with the Spiratube on the fridge cord, then transferred it to the black power cord on the coffee grinder, mentioned above. And that proved to be exactly what I suspected: the Spiratube did perform better on the black power cord of the coffee grinder! 

In fact, the change in sound was exactly the same signature as the location near the hot water tank. Which is, that it offered more control and precision to the music. I have since heard the benefits of this greater control and precision on my full hifi system, my TV, my desktop computer, my mp3 player and my cell. I note that in both cases where this greater precision was heard, the objects that the Morphic Cable tag and Spiratube were applied to (the power cord and the plastic basin), were both black. Coincidence? If I've learned anything about Beltism in nearly 40 years of playing around in it, I'd say... "eh, probably not". πŸ˜


CLOSING REMARKS

After living with this for about two weeks now, I can honestly say, that since having the opportunity to play around with the Morphic Cable Label tags, my sound has never been better! I know this, because I am hearing new information on old and very familiar songs, ie. Paul Simon's "Diamonds On the Soles of Her Shoes". 

Information that offers a new perspective on old material. New musical textures, new dynamics, new reverb, and even sometimes, new melodies, not observed before. And by this, I mean I heard this information on a cell phone, with a $10 pair of earbuds. 😳 

And since it's actual new musical information, that means I never heard it previously on any of my full-size hifi systems! And it's not "simply the result of a heightened and more alert state during an audio test", as the 'objectivist' trolls on the boards like to argue. πŸ˜’ As this experience did not change in the two weeks I was listening to and rediscovering my music, with the Morphic Cable Labels in place. For such a versatile product at such a reasonable price, I think I would call that a very good value!


- The Advanced Audiophile. 

Bookmark and Share

"PWB Fractal Label" from P.W.B. Electronics, U.K.
aka "The pot of gold at the end of the rainbow."


INTRODUCTION 

Today, we have some exciting news to share!… The long-awaited final version of the “P.W.B. Fractal Labels”. Last year, I got the opportunity to test out the beta-version of this audio treatment device. That was a combination of various shiny treated foils ("Silver Foil", "Speckled Foil", "Silver Rainbow Foil", "Gold-Silver Foil", "Double Gold Foil"), plus a completely transparent version of the fractal image. 

This time, the Fractal Label has been minimized to a single device; a combination of SR & Gold/Silver foil and patterns, with the fractal image printed on transparent film and superimposed on that. That, and a lot more I’m quite sure, all in a significantly smaller package. This smaller size, as you will see later on in this review, makes it possible to treat a device that would have been impossible, with the earlier, larger beta version. And at the risk of putting the cart before the horse, that is indeed something you might want to do….. 


PRE-IMPRESSIONS

Upon opening the envelope, and before taking the Fractal Labels out of their ziploc bag, I could sense ‘something was up’. I could feel a rather strong energy coming from one side of the bag, much more than the other. Of course, it was the side that showed the fractal labels. The energy was more ‘correct’ when the bag was turned to a certain position. Upon closer inspection, that position turned out to be where the writing on the instructional leaflet was right side up. 

What this energy reading tells me, is simply that whatever is in this bag, is going to have a discernible effect, "dis, dat’ or d'udda", once in play....


WHAT IT IS, WHAT IT IS

This latest treated adhesive sticker label from P.W.B. makes use of, for the first time, a fractal image. So… a lot of math behind this! Plus, colours, shapes, materials, and the various proprietary methods with which they have all been treated to, will all have a significant effect on…. sound? No! But it’s easy for people to get confused about that! On tension

Like all audio treatments from P.W.B., it works by reducing (or rather, changing**) levels of human tension. Which in turn, has an effect on our qualities of sensory perception, including what we're most interested in here, our ability to perceive sound

(**n.b. It isn't really accurate to say “This reduces tension”, because this phenomenon doesn’t work as simply as a light switch. Although it’s possible to feel levels of tension being reduced by such treatments, at least I do, one might say it is reduced/changed in infinitely different ways. As different treatments, or different locations of the same treatment, produces infinitely different qualities of sound perceived). 

In this, I couldn’t help but be reminded of my own 'Beltist' experiments with images, many many years ago. Such as way back in the days of CD burners, where I’d completely cover my burner with small printed images. (Some of which were so small, you couldn't say they were images....). 

Some of the stronger ones, as I recall, being images from “The Voynich Manuscript”, images of clocks, images of hypnotic swirls, images of P.W.B. devices themselves… and even that image of the brown dog used by PWB for the Aspirin experiment, was a nice one. Heck, I even hid some of these images in tricky ways on the front page of my audio blog. Knowing that as soon as people landed on it, their sound would improve, without them realizing it! 

But these Fractal Image Labels… these were curious things. They looked familiar to anyone that had previously experimented with the transparent Fractal Label and its accompanying foils. But I didn’t yet know how to answer the burning question; “Where do they want to go?”. With the Beta foils, I knew some foils prefer to be placed on wood, for example. Some were reported to work well with spinning devices, such as on turntables, CD or perhaps tape players. But with these, I was flying blind. All I knew, is that there is a “right side up”. I gathered that from turning the label 4 times, 90 degrees each time. One felt more ‘right’ than the others. 

Except I can’t elucidate that to anyone else (who hasn't yet learned to feel their way through this…). The image on the front appears to be the same, either way up. On the back are 3 lines. But with two black lines on the exterior and one brown in the centre, no way to identify up from down. Anyway, since the more right position is in landscape, there is only two possibilities to listen to. So it shouldn’t be too hard to figure out which direction sounds better, if someone wishes to try! 


GETTING ACQUAINTED 

The next thing I did was to simply take a sticker and move it across objects; my TV, my wall thermostat, a few of my speakers….. first with the image facing upward, then with the image facing downward. Again, no actual listening involved (yet!). Other than listening for feeling. πŸ˜‰

What I observed from this exercise, was that this thing prefers a horizontal orientation, more than a vertical one. On every surface or object I ran it across. Not unlike the Beta foils, I should add. Next I tested whether its “working surface” should be facing outward or inward. And like everything it seems… (πŸ˜”), it prefers inward**. Or rather, I should say, I had a stronger preference for the type of energy feedback, given when the sticker was held to the object (horizontally, I reiterate), with the image toward the object. 

The πŸ˜” comes because I realize this makes the adhesive backing kind of non-functional, if applied this way. But I can still apply it using ‘sellotape’ (aka ‘scotch tape’) or blue-tak. (n.b. I have never actually tested which of these is better, soundwise!). That’s never as good as not introducing additional adhesives, but at least it gives me the option of moving it elsewhere, if I so choose. 


INSY vs. OUTSY 

**As to whether the foil should be placed with the front face outward or inward (toward the object it’s being attached to), I would say that is strictly a matter of preference. I don’t feel either has the corner on the ideal sound, but here’s what I observed in this series of tests: 

If placed toward the object, this will bring a sound that is dark, stuffy, muted in the mids and highs… among other things. An inaccurate sound, to be sure. But some of those other things involve a greater level of musicality, which keeps me more engaged with the music. It also brings a lower level of tension, overall, if that matters any. 

Alternatively, with the image facing outward (which I presume is how it was designed and intended to be used), you now have a sound that is more balanced (if a bit lighter in bass weight?). And a neutral and a fuller spectrum of the music can be heard. 

But again, I don’t feel this as engaging. Despite that I am keenly aware of the lack of details in the musical picture, when the image is facing the object. (And I do think it was designed for and intended to be used with the image facing outward). Just knowing that you can change the sound like this, is good enough. Because it means you can have one foil facing one way, another facing the other, until you get a sound with a satisfying combination of the qualities you are looking for, in a sound.


LOCATION LOCATION LOCATION 

Well now that I figured out how I want to apply the sticker, that’s when the fun begins…. That leaves the question of where best to apply the P.W.B. Fractal Label. “Will it be the ‘usual’ hot spots”?”, I ask myself. Or is this something that plays well with certain materials or objects, more than others, like some of the Beta labels? 

In the beginning, in the first few experiments, I did not get good results, anywhere. I wondered if this was a problem with the design itself, and if the foils that I had tried in the earlier Beta test, weren’t already better. "Is this one too "busy", having too many things going on at once?", I wondered. This was after trying the new Fractal Label on my amplifier, my audio rack, the baseboard of the wall behind the system, a clock, speakers, etc. 

(At least initially), the very places where the earlier foils worked well, didn’t have the same effect with this. I mean, sure, the “sound” improved…. (a larger soundstage for example). But the way it did, did nothing for me. It was one of those lateral improvements you get in audio… where one thing improves, while a whole bunch of other things get worse. I knew things were off track when, even though the sound might seem lovely to someone else wandering into the room, my mind would wander off during the listen.... 

...This was no more evident than on the YouTube video that, for the sake of convenience, I was using as the test track (played on my TV, via the home cinema system). More specifically, it was a user-uploaded video of Mark Knopfler's "You and Your Friend", where someone was playing the LP on their Thoren's record deck. Where I should have been enthralled by the performance, I found myself focusing on seeing the video's uploader walking around the room, via the reflection in the turntable's platter! Which is not what I had in mind to do....


BREAKER BOX






THE SET-UP:


...I couldn’t see what would bring this device to life. So I jumped on the computer to give a closer read to those respondents on the P.W.B. Electronics forum, who had tried the device! Those who had success in “the usual places” wasn’t working for me, so I didn’t pursue that further. I took note of David Irvine's recounting of placing it on his hydro box (electric meter). Thus, I went outside my place to install the device in the hydro area. 

I experimented for a good location, by feel alone, by moving the Fractal Label on all sides of the hydro meter going into my place. But that didn’t seem all that great. Placing it over the display was probably the best spot there, but I couldn't well leave it there, for obvious reasons. After trying a few other meters and boxes nearby, I found what felt like a “neutral feedback”, on a large circuit breaker panel box (see photo), that feeds the entire place. I felt the best location to be on the outside cover, at the very bottom. And that is where I sellotaped the Fractal Foil. 

TBH, I think the reason why this felt like a better location, is simply because it was the box closest to the floor.πŸ‘‡


THE SOUND:


When I went to listen to this installation, yeah…. that did it for me! I also learned what that feeling of “neutral feedback” meant in sonic terms. In this case, it was a sound that was surprisingly bass-light. But I actually did not mind the result of that lightening of the bass region, because of the overall sound. 

It gave a balanced sound, not shy in high end detail, and more importantly, one that only reminded me I was doing a listening test, well and truly into the song. This meant that not only did I no longer feel distracted while the music was playing, but I didn’t want it to end. It also meant the sound was very fluid, and natural in its dynamics, as with timbre and resolution. 

So indeed, a welcome improvement this time, and an improvement that was, interestingly, not of the character of any of the foils or the original fractal image in last year’s Beta test, in my experience with those devices. To make no mistake about it, the side effect of an installation like this, is a reduction in tension. This can be likened to… opening a window on a cool day, to let some air in a stuffy room.


INTERIOR BREAKER BOX 


I then tried it on a smaller breaker box situated in a different and more interior location. It was not as good as the larger box (that contained more powerful circuit lines), but still good. 


HOT WATER TANK





Next; the hot water tank. Not near the entrance of the hot or cold pipes, the best location was determined (by feel) to be at the bottom of the tank, near where the brass spout exits water. This proved to be not nearly as good as the previous smaller circuit box, with a more blurry, smaller sound. It was eliminated from the running.

THE FREEZER





Next; the back of the freezer. This is one of those ‘hot spots’ I was talking about earlier. Specifically, on the back wall of the freezer. After I placed it there and returned to my listening room, I finally realized something I had only suspected in earlier trials: I could feel the effect of the change as I walked back to my listening spot! I could feel an easing of tension.

Still, the resulting character of sound wasn't anything to write home, or here, about. In that it was alright, but not deemed as good as the breaker box locations. 


BATTERIES






THE SET-UP:

I was sorting through my battery drawer today, verifying each one, to see which I should toss. When I came across two unusual, rectangular 2v sealed-lead acid batteries. 

As far as I know, there is only one device on the planet, that uses these batteries. That would be the super slim Aiwa portable tape player that I had (have?). It must have been way back in the 80’s when I bought these, but I can still remember scouring the streets of New York City, looking for them! I don’t know why I still have them after so long, but I was about to toss them, regardless of whether they still work, when I asked myself the obvious question: “I wonder if they would respond well to being treated by the new Fractal image label?”. 

Thus, I started by passing the card over the battery, to see whether the Fractal Label might mate well with the battery, and how. So ok… it started to look like this was worth a test. As I floated the card across the gold contacts on the face of the battery, I could definitely sense a strong energy feedback from that area. Not a good energy, mind. (By that, I mean the kind of energy that increases tension, instead of reducing it). 

The ‘magic’ occurred when I finalized the positioning of the Fractal Label on this battery. That is, when I turned the battery over to its back side, placed the label with the image facing the back of the battery, and taped the label to the battery. (Carefully! making sure not to reorient the tape…. but to place one small piece on either side of the card, in the same position that the tape came off the roll. And in another effort to maximize the potential benefit, I was careful not to fold the tape over to another side of the battery). 

Once this was done, I immediately felt a lowering of tension, that brought my body down. Going from past experience, as one does, I would have bet the farm that this was going to be good, when the music came on…. 




THE SOUND:

And the sound was…. fuggedaboutit! And I mean that, because there is nothing to say. It was unmistakably superior to what was, but the fact that it was so engaging, made it impossible to listen to it analytically, to be able to say what changed. I was just grooving to the music (Margaret Glaspy playing “Love Like This”, in this case…). 

Everything came together beautifully, as the fidelity got bumped up a few notches, and I heard the music in a whole different light. And hey, it was already good to start off with! So how does this translate for people who don’t have rectangular 2v Aiwa batteries? (Yes, it occurred to me that I may be the last person on the planet who has these!). 

Well, the back of the Aiwa battery, as example, is the underside of a 9v. So in the case of a 9v, the image would face the back of the battery, and be taped to the sides (or blue-tacked). Then, the battery would be installed with its contacts facing the earth. (BTW, I’m pretty sure the battery doesn’t have to have any juice in it, and it’s probably just as well if it’s dead). 

So now with three of these Fractal Labels in place… I do believe, we’ve got a party going. But I had to ask myself now, “Well… does it work well on anything that isn’t electrical??”. If not, it would be the first PWB product I test that doesn’t fit a variety of scenarios. Not one to take the easy way out, I was determined to see where else the device would work... 


LOUDSPEAKERS





THE SET-UP:

By the time I get around to installing the fourth sticker, it’s two in the morning. So this time, I’m doing my listening on a sound bar at a rather low volume, so as not to wake anyone up. Nevertheless, the sound is fabulous. I can hear in other ways, the improvements from the Fractal treatments earlier in the day. Melody lines in songs I’m intimately familiar with (as I use them often in testing), but have never heard before. When this happens, it’s what I term “a real change”. 

As a starting point to find a more traditional, or at least a non-electrical location for the foil, I took a cue on the P.W.B. message forum from Adrian Coppola’s report. Where he tried it on the front of a loudspeaker. I didn’t expect anything particularly good from this, as I did not get those “this is good!” vibes, when I was passing the foil over the front of the loudspeaker, earlier in the day. I removed the grill and felt the best location to be at the bottom of the front face of the speaker. (Normally I prefer to place things at the back of loudspeakers, but I did not think to try that this time). 

The preferred orientation here was with the foil in landscape, image facing the speaker, and ‘one way up rather than the other’. Once everything was in place, and as soon as the sticker was stuck on via Bluetac adhesive putty, I could feel a certain diminishing/neutralization of tension energy within my person. This gave me a reasonable confidence that I was on the right track, as I placed the grill back on, and went to listen to the same track again. 


THE SOUND:

And right away, I could hear the change! And the change was not good! Oh, that beautiful, luscious, mesmerizing, detailed sound I was enjoying before, was no more! It seemed to be replaced with something by “Lloyd’s”. It was dark and dreary, worn and weary. But then another surprise came about, when in a matter of seconds, I found myself really enjoying this sound! That gets a big… “HUH”?? 😧

Oh yeah, this was another “fuggedaboutit!” moment. But a decidedly different sound from the first “fuggedaboutit” experience. Yet, like the first, it made you want to forget about analyzing the details of the sound (as if you could, anyway!). Instead, it just made me want to sing… or dance. 

What it also made me do, after about ten seconds into the test track, was close my eyes. This is an involuntary action, and often occurs in a trial, when the sound is particularly engaging. But I only naturally felt like opening my eyes at exactly 3 minutes into the song, almost at the end of it! That isn’t common with me, and as such, I don’t think it’s ever been that long before. 

And I put on other tracks to get a sense of what exactly I was hearing, with this atypical new “sound”. That confirmed a few things…. Among them that, yes, it was indeed a small, dark sound, lacking in extension and detail, if not resolution, compared to the sound of the three previous installations of Fractal Foil Labels. But it was by no means a (totally) inaccurate representation of the music. And on tracks with a lot of HF (high frequency) energy, you could still hear treble. You were never overwhelmed by it, of course. 

That said, I would describe it as a “Linn Sondek” sort of sound. It would make everything sound like vinyl. But even so, not just any vinyl — vinyl being played on a particularly musical record deck! Oh, and it had bags of musicality! Engaging to the point of being gripping, and all the evidence that was needed, was there when I replayed the “You and Your Friend” video. That I had used as a test track earlier in the day, on the HT system.

No matter that I was now listening to it at a low volume on a sound bar, instead of being bored and looking at details in the video like the last time, I actually felt those emotional pangs you sometimes (rarely!) feel, during a really musical performance. (Triggered by the notes Mark Knopfler was playing on his melodic guitar, combined with the installation of this label!). The second thing I observed, despite that I was not interested this time in the visual aspect of the playing of this video, was that the picture was noticeably clearer and sharper than before. I noticed this on numerous images on the display, since this last install. 

Now, I’m not sure if there should be a second foil, on the right loudspeaker. I mention it because, sitting at my listening post in between the speakers, I thought I might be getting a sense that things are little lop-sided…. (more energy coming from the left side of the stereo?). Then again, I don’t know if having two in the chain will upset the order of things, as I didn’t test for that.

In sum, I may have lost something(s) in my sound, by installing this last foil, on the loudspeaker. Good things, to be sure. But as an audiophile, this musical type of sound is something I have always sought. Rarely achieved, actually. And if you can get a sound that makes you one with the music; is able to communicate its emotion, and lowers your tension levels to boot… is there anything better? 

In a later experiment, I found that I can turn one of the other Fractal Labels I installed, so that the image is facing outward, and then my sound is not so dark, any longer. Sure, some of that gorgeous musicality is lost, but some of the detail comes back, and it doesn't sound so much like a 1960's hi-fi set-up.



BIGGISH TIME DELAY FUSE






THE SET-UP:

Well... while in the breaker box area, I found a 400a 250v time delay buss fuse. With a barcode on it. Are you thinking what I'm thinking? Yeah... let's see how it takes to a Fractal label!....

I taped the Fractal label (horizontally) to the centre of the tube, over the barcode label, with the image facing the fuse. I then brought the fuse into my place, all the way toward the back (East) wall, then placed the fuse on the floor, with the Fractal label facing the floor. (The fuse was almost, but not touching the back wall). 


THE SOUND:


I then played "Put Me Thru" by Anderson .Paak. ..."MELLOW" is how I would describe this sound. Just like that. With all caps for greater emphasis! It brought not just a soothing sound, but a soothing feeling, during the listening of the soothing sound. A sound that could never tire, because all highs and mids wore a dark veil, Think a few clicks down on the treble knob. You won’t be getting sparkle on guitar strings or piano keys with this set-up.

So, not accurate, but though I know this, I don’t mind. What remains of this is a very alluring and musical sound, with fast tight bass, and a lower level of inner tension in the listener . If it sounds like the description I gave for the loudspeaker test (above), there’s two reasons for that: 

1) I’m not sure if there are any notable differences between these two sounds/locations, and 

2) as also described earlier, this ‘dark veil’ could be removed by reversing the position of the label so that it’s image faces outward. (I might note that the placement on the ground also contributes a bit to this quality). 

Basically, the loudspeaker sound described above, is the result of a change to attack & decay qualities, where they are very short (n.b. I know this from years of training my ears with the "bonger" test on the Chesky Audiophile CD!). In the case of this buss fuse, same sort of thing, but either the attack or decay (not sure), is somewhat longer.

It may not be for everyone, but I quite like the fact that if I ever find my sound too grating, I know exactly how to pacify and smooth it over. And can do it in a matter of seconds, with the use of a single Fractal label. And I'm happy with the sound as it stands, so whatever its shortcomings, I'm not planning on moving this one.

n.b. I realize a "big-gish" ("big-ly"?) time-delay fuse is not in everyone's kitchen drawer.... A good substitute would probably be.... nothing. That is, location here is probably playing a significant role, and some of the effect described can perhaps be had, by following everything but the "fuse" part. That is, just taping the label (face up) to the floor, right near (but not up against) an exterior wall.



A TREE





...Ok, this is kind of stupid. At least, that’s sort of how I felt, trying to tape this Fractal label to the trunk of a young tree, near the base. (It had been raining recently, and it kept falling off!). At least the tree, outside my residence, was still on the grounds. It was a “boundary test”. Just earlier, I had done a related test, where I stuck a Fractal label on the circuit breaker box of a nearby building (on the same grounds), and heard about as strong an effect, as I had when it was in my building. ….So would it extend to the trees out in front? 

In word…. no. The resulting sound was “ ‘orreebulla”, as the French say. Very possibly worse than having nothing there at all. Is this a condemnation of trees, though? Does it denote where boundaries lie, wrt Beltism? I am not prepared to answer either of those questions! Moving on!….


THE SMART PHONE


Do you want to know the best location I found in this series of tests, though? My smartphone. Specifically, the battery of my smart phone....




THE SET-UP: 

This last test was done at another time (on another day), when it was late at night. So I listened to mp3’s on my smartphone (paired with a pair of Monk earbuds), as the source for the test. Via the phone, I first listened to the effect of the Fractal foil label located on the front face of the loudspeaker, behind the speaker grill (as described earlier).

Then, for the next test, I removed the foil from the speaker, disassembled the cell phone, and taped the foil (landscape position) to the back bottom of the battery, with the image facing the battery. Then I replaced the cover and case, and listened again to my mp3 songs on the cell phone. 


THE SOUND:

As compared with the loudspeaker location, the sound with the foil located on the phone’s battery was… >kisssmack!<. Perfect

For once, and for whatever reason, I was listening to a sound I could not fault. Much much better than what I heard when the foil was placed on top of the loudspeaker. This time, the sound was not cold, nor overly warm. Engaging, but not too engaging. Tonally balanced. Fluid, but detailed. Bass is tight, mids precise, and highs are not muted, nor overstated. Well, it’s hard to fully describe a sonic character with words. Suffice to say, I know good sound when I hear it, and this was good sound. 

This good sound could later be heard simply listening to unboxing videos on my iMac's built-in speakers, via YouTube! I could resolve new levels of detail, such as the crispness of plastic or paper when the videographer was opening packages or moving objects. Or cues about the size and nature of the room, when the subject spoke. 

I had a feeling that the idea might have potential, because the foil would be treating a working battery, that would always be active while the listening was going on. Of course, I had no idea that it could sound better than anything I’ve tried before. The cream on the cake, is that I could take this improvement anywhere! Normally, my good sound goes when I leave home. But in this case, wherever I go, the treated phone goes with me. 

Ah, but what if your cell phone has no removable battery, like most recent models? Then the label could still be affixed to the back cover, as if it was the battery. The sound could be not as good as on the battery, or potentially, it could even be better. (I've not tested). The thing is, the phone still contains a battery....



THE FLOOR





THE SET-UP:

Sorry, but when I said "Do you want to know the best location I found in this series of tests?" under the Smartphone test, I didn't know I had another test in me, before I would finally wrap this all up. It all started when....

....I brought the time-delay buss fuse into my listening room, just to see if it would fare any better in my actual listening room. As opposed to being located at the opposite end of the house, in my home office. I placed it under the a/v cabinet exactly in the manner that I had initially done in the office. With the Fractal Foil Label taped to the bottom of the fuse, and the fuse situated horizontally on the floor under the cabinet, very close to but not touching the wall. I had a feeling it would be worse in my listening room, and I was not disappointed. It was worse. 

I played Diana Krall's cover of Tom Waits' "Temptation". Which has a lot of double bass notes at the beginning. This session was very late at night again, so I had to play at a very low volume. But I could still hear that it was worse, than when the fuse was in the office room. There was more high end energy, yes. But resolution and sound-staging were smaller, bass was lighter. I also found that the video picture on TV was more "3D", when the fuse was in the office. Not a good sign.

So out of curiosity, I decided to answer a question I had wondered about earlier: "What about simply removing the fuse from the equasion? What would that do?". Yet surely the label is doing something good by being "fused" to the fuse. I mean look at it! Does that fuse look like it's doing anything good to your audio sound?? Anyway, I removed the fuse and instead, taped the Fractal Label directly to the floor, under the a/v cabinet, in the middle of my speakers. Close but not touching the wall, and with the label's image facing the floor.

THE SOUND


I listened to Diana Krall's cover of Tom Wait's "Temptation" again, under the new set-up... I did not know what to make of this sound?? What was I listening to, what was I hearing?? Something unexpected, I can say. I might describe it as a "non-sound", if that makes any sense to anyone....

It's difficult to describe a "non-sound", in analytical terms. Especially when it's the first sound I've termed a "non-sound". But I did notice right off the bat, the bass was.... really different. Those rapid start/stop bass notes at the start of this song, that could all be heard clearly and individually in the "buss fuse" version, were all washed over and blurred, in the "direct-to-floor" version. 

So.... this was much, much worse.... right?? Hmmm.... that was my first reaction. But as I was listening, I realized I was listening to a (character of) sound I had not heard before. And that really shouldn't be the case, because it's not like I've never placed a PWB device on the floor before! In fact, it's where I located the last Christmas card from PWB! (Though I've never tried labels alone, or taped anything to the floor). Yet it sure seemed like it was.

It seemed like the sound had no character of its own. It just played out like a very, very natural sort of sound. Not even a riveting sound, as I described on the loudspeaker test above. Nor a boring sound, by any stretch. So while it did not cause me to close my eyes during the music, all I could think to want to do, was listen to the music. And while this might suggest that it was similar to the mellow, musical sounds I was able to obtain with the Fractal Foil Label on the loudspeakers or the time-delay fuse, this sound seemed entirely unrelated to them. 

Like them though, it'd be difficult to call it "tonally neutral", as there were warm embers all across the entire frequency spectrum. And while there was no sparkle here either, it did not seem the result of a short attack/short delay type of change. Nor did it seem like anything was really missing, since the soundstage became expansive, and I could hear details in familiar songs, not heard before. Just imagine your sound took a wide leap forward in fidelity, but never got rough or ragged on the edges of the harshest notes.... and you'd have some idea.

I suppose it might be called "neutral", in the energy it imparts. That is, since and long after this installation, I have felt the absence of a layer of tension, that is normally not absent. Moreover, I can now hear and feel the absence of tension created by vocals, in music! Which is to say, I'm only keenly aware of it now, that before this, vocals (along with other parts of the music I'm sure), create some degree of tension in the listener. It is because they are not properly being reproduced. (Think "shouty" vocals, but to a much, much more subtle degree). It's only when that is gone, that you realize it shouldn't have been like that, before!

So I'm not sure what to compare this sound to. I just know that I like it. A lot. It is the most preferred sound I was able to obtain with the Fractal Foil Labels these past few days, out of all the experiments listed (and not listed...) herein. And I'm going to have fun re-discovering my music collection in the next few weeks. 

I have no plans of not adopting this type of installation. However, this was placed on the South wall,  and just from looking around the place (with my eyes!), the best energy seems to be coming from the East wall. This theory was confirmed when I reluctantly brought the label back over to the other side of the place; my office room with the exterior East wall.

One final small detail: As to where to place it along the wall, I presumed around the centre of the room. (That is usually where I locate such things). Just to confirm, I held my open palm sideways, and started 'slicing' segments of the room, starting from the North side. I found that energy goes from lighter to darker here, as you move from North to South**. ('Darker' is the preferred energy profile!). Which I then presumed meant the label should be placed just near the baseboard of the East wall, in the South corner of the room. (Which would be the right corner of the room, in my case). 

Except.... as I moved along, I found energy peaked before the right corner, and then got lighter again. So for the record, the final spot where this last Fractal label ended up, is about two-thirds along the East wall of my office room, approximately 3' from the right (South) corner. The Chet Baker Quartet agrees. Will have to be careful about mopping over that area, in the future! (I think sweeping will be ok, since its taped to the floor with a type of strong, flexible tape).


**Sidenote: (I almost forgot doing this... but I recall now, that a couple of days ago, I was doing a Google image search for "orange satsuma". I wanted to know what colour this was. It was triggered by a post from John Peter on the PWB forum, saying it made a good background for a treatment. 

It brought up a lot of pictures of Japanese mandarines and such! So with my eyes, I scanned rows of pictures of oranges, to feel if there was anything 'special' about them. I felt that the picture to the right of the first picture, was a bit 'better'. Then the picture to the right of that, was a bit better than the previous. Then the picture to the right of that... ok, to speed this up, I started to realize the energy I was reading wasn't in the pictures themselves. It was in the location on the screen, regardless of which row of pictures I was scanning. All pictures on the right side of my screen were somewhat 'better' than those on the left.

...Then I thought, "Is it even the screen?? What if I pull out of that, and just scan the room?". You can probably see where this is going!... From my desk perch, as I started focusing on the left corner of the room in front of me, slowly moving my eyes toward the right.... I could sense energy got progressively darker from left to right. So even though I'd forgotten that moment, it makes sense that I would see the same pattern in my test today. 

And as you might imagine, if an energy is read as 'darker', this is the effect it will have on the music. ie. If I place an object (any object) in the left (North) corner of this room, and it changes my sound to a perceptible degree (everything changes sound, but 'perceptible' is another matter....), the character that sound is likely to exhibit, is a brighter and less engaging sound).
  





CLOSING REMARKS


The combination of foils/image in last year's Beta test of this product, with careful placement, allowed me to create a sound superior to any PWB product I can recall testing in the past. We're talking real changes that make you rediscover your record collection.

What "The Floor" experiment revealed to me was, the Fractal Foil was on another plane. If one is able to reproduce what I experienced, it'll make you raise your standards of what reproduced music in the home should be. Experiencing that sort of improvement, reminds me of why I ever got into this audiophile nonsense in the first place. Oh, and if you do manage to get to a place that sounds like my description, with the floor installation? My advice to you consists of three simple words: DON'T. MOVE. IT. 😑

Given that my success with them was slow to start, I might say that the Fractal Foil Labels seem to require more care in placement than the previous batch of foils. At least, in my personal, and initial experience, in this round of tests. They're well worth the effort though, IMO. As example, if one tries to duplicate the character of sound achieved with a single Fractal Foil Label in The Floor test using conventional audio devices, well... they can't. 

I know what conventional audio components can and can't do. They can certainly bring a lot of good things to your music, and potentially have a much greater (as in "more noticeable") effect on sound, than the Fractals. But they won't change the sound in that way, as heard. It is not the type of sound that electronics (including wires) can create.

Well, with such good things coming out of the audiophile magic factory, methinks P.W.B. is heading in the right direction…..  πŸ˜€


- The Advanced Audiophile. 


Bookmark and Share


A long time ago, in a galaxy far far away, a group of elite Jedi fighters were training to use a mysterious "force", to aid them in their quest for security and a better life.

On this planet, not so many years ago (roughly 10), I embarked on a series of audio experiments that involved aligning slotted screws on light switch plates (link), so that they were 180 degrees vertical. This was, naturally, an idea from Peter Belt, of P.W.B. Electronics. One which I sought to validate or invalidate. Of course, like all P.W.B. ideas on improving perception of sound that I have ever tried, it worked. Actually, I knew that going in. I was already an experienced “Belter” by that point, and I had already done the screw alignment thing elsewhere.  Apart from the improvement in sound, what I noticed each time that I aligned the screws, was that my throat would start to create saliva. A kind of tension in the throat feeling.

Of course, like most everyone at first, I didn’t think too much of it. Strange though, that it kept occurring right after that specific event of "turning the screw”, and even if it didn’t happen every time, it happened over and over again, as I went throughout the house turning screws on all the wall plates. I have since experienced this very same feeling dozens of times or more, over the years that have passed. I didn’t know it then, but this was one of the most earliest times when I finally started becoming conscious of the fact that the things I would do during my audio research experiments, could be felt before they were ever heard. 

 Another early example of this, was after I initiated some sort of tweak. It didn’t have to be a P.W.B. “Belt tweak” either. I would go to hit PLAY on the CD or cassette player, and I’d get a funny feeling. A premonition, of what the resulting sound would be, just before hitting the PLAY button. Whether that "premonition” was a good or a bad feeling, it was almost always spot on. Again, as with the screws, I didn’t quite join an association with the audio-related change I was effecting. By way of my logical thinking, I just thought it was a strange coincidence, until I could be sure there was a connection. 

 Well now I am sure there is a connection. I have been for years. I use that connection all the time now, when attempting improvements in my sound. In fact, I still get that “throat saliva” feeling (a symptom of anxiety and tension). But only on occasion, and only under specific conditions. I have yet to determine if there’s a pattern for the saliva condition. But, for example, it recently happened when the polarity of my speaker wires was wrong. I fixed the polarity and that stopped the whole throat salivation feeling.  Sometimes I’ll be setting my equipment up and feel some anxiety, and I don’t know why. Then I take an educated guess, switch the speakers or the speaker stands around, and that’s what it was. (Yes, paired items do reflect a difference, when switched from left to right and vice versa). Or, like today, the feeling of unrest was due to 3 pieces of "Fun-Tac" putty adhesive under one speaker, placed in a triangular fashion, that did not match the 3 pieces under the other speaker, placed in an upside down triangle! This has been a "game-changer”. Not just for my hobby, but for my life. I can’t help but make comparisons to the mysterious "force" effect, from the Star Wars trilogy. Because now, that’s me. I am “Obi-Wan Kenobi” in audio terms, and I can feel the "force", that is all around us, imbued in all things. But don't worry, I will only use it for good (sound), not evil!

 For example, I can pick up a rock, or a glass of water, or scotch tape, a book, a pencil, a USB key, touch a wall… whatever… and using "the force", in a couple of seconds, I can determine that object’s “energy character”. Suffice to say, this is a great help in audio research experiments. I could, for example, approach an entire box of phono cables, that would take a traditional audio researcher countless hours to listen to, to determine the best sounding cable. Picking up and tossing each cable on to the floor, I could go through the box in a minute or two, and narrow down the best choices for trial, before listening to anything.  

Now, I don’t mean to make it sound like it's as easy as 1-2-3. The process is usually more complicated than just grabbing something for a second. Because, for example, I came to realize that the energy patterns change depending on which hand (or finger) is used to touch the object. Or when the item is changed from one hand to another. But in this case, the pattern merely -switches-. It’s not a random change, either. Like most of these sensations I'm dealing with, it’s a predictable one. More or less, I’ve learned to discard such “extraneous information”, and get a more meaningful reading of the energy patterns inherent in a “thing”. But wait, don’t back out of the room just yet!  I still do traditional listening tests! I still need to know just how my “feeling tests” correlate with the listening part. But there is always a connection between the two. And, over 10 years and hundreds of such tests later, I now know it is not a coincidence.

If there’s anything I would like people to take away from my story (besides “He’s cray-cray…. Just back up slowly and get out of the room!”), it’s to listen to those “coincidences” you may be feeling. For you may find, after time, there may be a connection with the feeling, and the event.  As an example of that, I was on the couch watching a movie one time, and all of a sudden, I feel a drop in inner tension. I may have heard a slight noise, but I didn’t know what happened. I looked over to my left, and indeed, an AC adapter had fallen out of the wall outlet, taking two or three wires out. That was not a coincidence, either. Every time I pull a plug out of an outlet or extension, that very same “drop in tension” feeling occurs.

This is because anything plugged into an outlet, is creating tension within us. And no, it's not an electrical phenomenon, ie. EMF/RFI. This will occur even if the device is not being powered, or the wire is not connected to anything. Because any one thing joining another, creates a certain tension. (It is why I recommend not to push speakers and stands right up against the wall, but to leave a tiny gap so that the two objects don’t touch).  I’m sure it strains credulity for many people, to say you can feel “energy” in objects by touching them.

Well, let me go a little further than that. This "force", these "energy fields" that I am sensing (that we are all sensing at all times, conscious or not), are not just within objects or hovering over them. They are around them. Meaning, they project out. How far out? I don’t know. I didn’t test them from outer space. I only know that I can sense their projection from one end of a room to another. For all I know, it is, like everything else in the universe…. Infinite, or nearly so.

Here’s an example of that…. One time, I was watching a friend give a Tai Chi demonstration to a group of us. He was showing us the two different styles of Tai Chi he learned. All of a sudden, I could sense changes within me, when he switched over to the second style. (He didn’t announce the switch). Of course, I had no idea that was going to happen. But it felt just like with the audio experiments. Where I would effect a change with a physical action, and feel that change within me. Except this time, I wasn’t touching any object, to feel the changes. I was simply using my sense of sight, and that by itself, could create perceptions of feeling, much as with the audio experiments.  Since then, I’ve corroborated this effect countless times.

For example, I can look at words or pictures on a computer screen, and feel specific kinds of energy from looking at specific pictures or words. (And btw, after copying and pasting the words or pictures in the digital realm, its energy will change. Even though the content itself does not). Concluding that the constantly varying levels of tension within us, change not just by the presence of objects in the environment, but by looking at them! Ok, it may not quite be “Schrodinger’s Cat” but… did Schrodinger have a mouse, perhaps? Another example might be where I am ordering three components on a shelf of my audio stand. One of them is a DVD player that is the most heavily treated audio component I have ever done. It has over 150 treatments done to it! So I put it on the bottom, then stack two components on top of that. But without bothering to listen, I can tell by feel, that this was not an ideal arrangement.

So how should they be stacked, I wondered to myself? I only know that I am not about to run listening tests on each of the possible ways to order these components! I didn’t even want to take the time and trouble to physically change them around, and feel the changes. So instead, I just looked at the components, and after doing so, some mysterious sort of sixth sense feeling (aka "the force"!) seemed to suggest to me that the treated player should go in the middle. So I tried it that way, and the feeling feedback from that particular order felt more or less right. It gave a more restrained sense of tension. 

My logical mind however, did not at all suggest that putting the treated player in the centre of the stack was the best option. Experience, if nothing else, told me it should be on the bottom. I would have reasoned that on the bottom, the object with the “good energy” acts as a foundation, and has a better chance to influence the objects on top it. Not the case, since the middle position gave the better feeling. Upon listening, as always, that feeling was confirmed. The sound had improved, but not in a way I’d expected. Instead of the expected richer sound with greater resolution, it was a more integrated sound, with greater ability to convey that elusive sense of ‘musicality’. A sound that was more captivating, than incisive. The kind of sound I never want to change, in the rare times I stumble upon it. 

But all that aside, trust me, there are definite drawbacks to being the “Obi-Wan Kenobi” of the audiophile world. As my friend Morrissey would say, “It’s lonely on a limb”. When I started out here in the online part of the audio community, some thirty years ago perhaps, I was already right out there on the bleeding edge of “audiophile loonies”, as they might have called us. I had my green “CD Stoplight Pen”, my red LED big-digits Tice power clock,  and no dogmatic technophile was going to tell me what time it was, in audiophile land!

But, at least I could say I had a few audiophile friends online, who heard the effects of things like green CD markers and other avant-garde audio gadgets, and whether they understood them or not, they were on my side of the ideological fence. They knew there were things people could hear, that science couldn’t explain (at least not with their tired old “sugar pill” theory). And so long as it improved their sound, they accepted that, whether they felt they understood the science behind the tweak or not. But this? Well, friends, this is different. This is where even what were once my brothers in arms on the audio forums, did not want to admit they knew me, or were associated in any way. There were the objectivists, there were the subjectivists… and then there was me! They didn’t even know what category to stuff me into. So they just labelled me “the audio witch doctor”.

This was not me saying “I bought a weird audio product that has some sketchy reasoning behind it, or simply no previously established modus operandi, and I swear it made a difference!". Because I know that some other people also bought that weird audio product, and maybe it was even reviewed in a magazine or two. Instead, this was me saying “I can feel specific modes of energy and degrees of tension by touching or just looking at things”. It’s the point where everyone leaves the room, and I’m standing on the podium speaking to my own echo.  Then, out and among the other members of the global audio community, the question becomes; “How do I convince someone who has no clue about any of this stuff?  Who has already built up decades of prejudices, most likely based on conventional (Western) belief systems - which says and knows nothing about “energy patterns” that affect human senses? Who not only is not at the level of where he can feel changes that affect his perception of sound, but probably cannot come anywhere near my level of listening skill, slowly built over a forty year interest in audio, when it comes to just registering fine differences, regardless?”.  It’s like convincing a man blind from birth, that yes, every object has a different “color”. He has no present way of validating that for himself, so he falls back to the default trigger; “It sounds like rubbish, I don’t believe you”. 

 When it comes to being able to “feel” changes before you hear them during (and outside of) audio tests, last I checked, no one is saying this. But… eh, perhaps not quite. There was a fellow I read of, name of “Frank Tchang”. He is notable for having designed small singing bowls, for audio use (similar to Synergistic Research's "Acoustic A.R.T. resonators"). They act as a room treatment system. To me, he is notable for one particular thing: he was said to have said something along the lines of, “Listening is a crutch for those who can’t feel”.

In keeping, I had read that he tested locations for his resonator bowls by feel alone. He is, in fact, at the time of this writing, the only other person in the audio world that I know of, that has at least a comparable ability to mine. So I am not completely alone on this (whew! Thought I was going crazy for a minute there….!). But… I doubt we have the same abilities. I’ve not heard of him applying this phenom to sight, for example. And, as individual “researchers”, we’re going to go in different directions and gain different abilities. Like anyone with anything. The other drawback to all of this, is a heightened sense of tension. Without which, I would not be able to do what I do. So it is a double-edged sword, for me.

Thankfully, I am not constantly feeling gnawing tension, on a conscious level, during everyday activities. That would be unbearable. But when I am focused on the listening experience, during tests and experiments, then I do feel those states of tension. It can also occur randomly, but it’s manageable. (i.e. I’m not thinking about audio but packing away boxes for housekeeping, I tear off the label from the plastic container, and without warning, I can feel a slight "whoosh" of tension lowering. Regardless of whether the label contains a bar code or not).  My argument, is that everyone is feeling these same states of tension. (Else, the other theory being, I am not made of human!). It’s just that I did enough audio experiments, in a particular niche of audio, to develop consciousness of what we are all feeling. Every. damn. day. of. our. lives! 

As you might imagine, this condition also makes me particularly critical of audio systems. So don’t invite me to listen to yours. I might not like it. And I won’t be shy about telling you so! I’ve heard half-million dollar systems at audio shows that I thought sucked (for the money, especially). Why, because for however majestic and powerful it was otherwise, their sound was ultimately not natural, and creating tension. It didn’t move me like a properly musical system can.

I’ve even put together systems for $500 that have a more pleasing and natural sound, producing lower levels of tension. It’s not easy, but it’s doable. The difference is, before “the awakening” (discovering "the force"), I could tolerate bad sounding sound systems. Didn’t sound good, so what, it wasn’t going to kill me. Now, it feels more like it might!  I was listening to my TV recently featuring a conversation with David Letterman, on some Bose satellite speakers I installed…. Which I’m sure sounded perfectly fine to anyone else. Put on a critical ear, and maybe you might say “They have slightly peaky upper mids, so what? Adds clarity”). Anyone else would have listened to the show, and that’s the end of it. But after a few minutes, I could no longer stand to listen to this, because of the tension created by those little Bose speakers! (And I knew very well they were the source of my unease, after I later modified them to behave better. Which I detail in the article “Home Cinema For The Minimalist Audiophile".

Much of that tension created by the speakers was eased somewhat, by simply placing the Bose cubes on their sides, rather than upright. The reason for this, is because Bose in their infinite wisdom, placed the drivers so that the usual voice coil terminations, pointed toward the right - instead of downward. Like all other speakers in the universe. You’re dealing with magnets here also, and that’s especially nasty stuff! So in its original unmodified state and upright position, the Bose speakers are creating tension. I might not notice it much, when cleaning house. But when playing something (like dialogue on the TV), that tension is literally amplified. Making me an unhappy camper, after a while. No one ever said being an "advanced audiophile” was going to be easy! Hey, it’s hard enough just being an audiophile these days! 

May the force be with you!

Bookmark and Share

Next